Aguilar v. Berryhill, 2:17-cv-00089-CKD. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20180305771
Visitors: 14
Filed: Mar. 02, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND [ PROPOSED ORDER] TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE CAROLYN K. DELANEY , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between Plaintiff and Defendant Commissioner of Social Security (Defendant), by and through their respective counsel of record, that the deadline for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff's Motion For Summary Judgment and/or to file any cross-motion thereto be extended by thirty (30) days, or from February 19, 2018 to March 21, 2018. Plaintiff filed his brief on
Summary: STIPULATION AND [ PROPOSED ORDER] TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE CAROLYN K. DELANEY , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between Plaintiff and Defendant Commissioner of Social Security (Defendant), by and through their respective counsel of record, that the deadline for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff's Motion For Summary Judgment and/or to file any cross-motion thereto be extended by thirty (30) days, or from February 19, 2018 to March 21, 2018. Plaintiff filed his brief on ..
More
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED ORDER] TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE
CAROLYN K. DELANEY, Magistrate Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between Plaintiff and Defendant Commissioner of Social Security (Defendant), by and through their respective counsel of record, that the deadline for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff's Motion For Summary Judgment and/or to file any cross-motion thereto be extended by thirty (30) days, or from February 19, 2018 to March 21, 2018. Plaintiff filed his brief on January 19, 2018 after one extension.
There is good cause for this extension because Defendant was re-assigned this matter after the departure of previously assigned counsel. In light of the issues Plaintiff raised in his brief and counsel's other workload, including litigation and non-litigation matters, Defendant respectfully requests additional time to brief this matter and apologizes for the late timing of this request.
The parties further stipulate that the Court's Scheduling Order shall be modified accordingly.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
