Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

AGK Sierra De Montserrat, L.P. v. Comerica Bank, 2:15-cv-01280-KJM-DAD. (2017)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20170510941 Visitors: 4
Filed: May 09, 2017
Latest Update: May 09, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND STAY OF ACTION KIMBERLY J. MUELLER , District Judge . Plaintiff AGK Sierra de Montserrat, L.P. ("AGK") and Defendant Comerica Bank ("Comerica") hereby stipulate and agree as follows: WHEREAS, AGK alleges in this indemnity action that Comerica is obligated to indemnify it for any liability and expenses incurred in certain litigation matters, including a case pending in the California Superior Court, County of Placer, titled Westwood Montserrat, Ltd. v. AGK S
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND STAY OF ACTION

Plaintiff AGK Sierra de Montserrat, L.P. ("AGK") and Defendant Comerica Bank ("Comerica") hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

WHEREAS, AGK alleges in this indemnity action that Comerica is obligated to indemnify it for any liability and expenses incurred in certain litigation matters, including a case pending in the California Superior Court, County of Placer, titled Westwood Montserrat, Ltd. v. AGK Sierra de Montserrat, Ltd., et al., Case No. SCV0032447 (the "Westwood Action");

WHEREAS, trial in the Westwood Action is currently set for June 26, 2017, having been continued from February 27, 2017;

WHEREAS, because Comerica's potential liability in this action might depend on the outcome of the Westwood Action, the parties are unable to complete discovery or meaningfully consider settlement until the Westwood Action is resolved;

WHEREAS, among other things, according to a motion for summary adjudication recently filed by the plaintiff in the Westwood Action, the plaintiff is seeking at least $3.6 million in damages or restitution, so a judgment in AGK's favor in the Westwood Action would potentially reduce AGK's alleged damages and Comerica's alleged liability in this action by at least $3.6 million, increasing the likelihood of any settlement;

WHEREAS, on November 5, 2015, the Court entered a scheduling order setting the final pretrial conference for May 19, 2017, trial for July 17, 2017, and other case deadlines [ECF Docket No. 11];

WHEREAS, on October 13, 2016, the Court entered a stay of this action through May 5, 2017 and vacated all other dates [ECF Docket No. 27];

WHEREAS, the parties agree that extending the stay by approximately five months, until roughly three months after the anticipated completion of the trial in the Westwood Action, is warranted to conserve judicial resources and the resources of the parties, to permit time for resolution of the Westwood Action, and provide the parties with the opportunity to meaningfully consider settlement in light of the outcome of the Westwood Action;

WHEREAS, this Stipulation and Order is without prejudice to the right of either party to request at any time that the Court lift the stay prior to October 2, 2017, or extend the stay past October 2, 2017.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED that:

(1) this action should remain stayed in its entirety through October 2, 2017; and

(2) a scheduling conference should be set for November 9, 2017 to reset the trial date and other case deadlines.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

IT IS SO ORDERED that:

1) this action shall remain stayed in its entirety through October 2, 2017;

2) the status conference set for May 11, 2017 at 2:30 p.m. is vacated; and

3) a scheduling conference is set for November 9, 2017 at 2:30 p.m. to reset the trial date and other case deadlines. The parties shall confer and file a joint conference statement by November 2, 2017.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer