Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Rosario v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, 2:15-cv-00813-JLR. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Washington Number: infdco20181012859 Visitors: 10
Filed: Oct. 02, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 02, 2018
Summary: STIPULATED [PROPOSED] ORDER JAMES L. ROBART , District Judge . [ Proposed ] ORDER The parties having so stipulated and agreed, it is hereby SO ORDERED. The parties are directed to file three-page letter briefs on their positions regarding: (1) whether the Court should specify specific rates of compliance for employment authorization document (EAD) adjudication as part of an implementation order and what those rates should be (2) the appropriate venue for filing any Federal District Cour
More

STIPULATED [PROPOSED] ORDER

[Proposed] ORDER

The parties having so stipulated and agreed, it is hereby SO ORDERED.

The parties are directed to file three-page letter briefs on their positions regarding: (1) whether the Court should specify specific rates of compliance for employment authorization document (EAD) adjudication as part of an implementation order and what those rates should be (2) the appropriate venue for filing any Federal District Court action where an EAD application is not adjudicated in compliance with this Court's order, after the individual has complied with the steps set forth in the implementation plan. The letter briefs of the parties are due within 7 days after the date of this order. The Court will resolve the dispute regarding the implementation plan and, as appropriate, the implementation plan.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer