SATA GmbH & CO. KG v. ZHEJIANG REFINE WUFU AIR TOOLS CO., LTD., 2:15-cv-02111-GMN-CWH. (2016)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20161208c81
Visitors: 14
Filed: Dec. 07, 2016
Latest Update: Dec. 07, 2016
Summary: YIN HUANG'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO WITHDRAW AS ATTORNEY OF RECORD FOR PRONA TOOLS, INC. CARL W. HOFFMAN, Jr. , Magistrate Judge . I. INTRODUCTION Pursuant to Local Rule IA 11-6 of this Court, attorney Yin Huang ("Counsel") hereby requests leave from the Court to withdraw as an attorney of record for defendant Prona Tools, Inc. ("Prona"). The specific request for withdrawal of attorney Yin Huang does not alter Prona's representation by the Marquis Aurbach Coffing firm or the Zuber Lawler
Summary: YIN HUANG'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO WITHDRAW AS ATTORNEY OF RECORD FOR PRONA TOOLS, INC. CARL W. HOFFMAN, Jr. , Magistrate Judge . I. INTRODUCTION Pursuant to Local Rule IA 11-6 of this Court, attorney Yin Huang ("Counsel") hereby requests leave from the Court to withdraw as an attorney of record for defendant Prona Tools, Inc. ("Prona"). The specific request for withdrawal of attorney Yin Huang does not alter Prona's representation by the Marquis Aurbach Coffing firm or the Zuber Lawler ..
More
YIN HUANG'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO WITHDRAW AS ATTORNEY OF RECORD FOR PRONA TOOLS, INC.
CARL W. HOFFMAN, Jr., Magistrate Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Pursuant to Local Rule IA 11-6 of this Court, attorney Yin Huang ("Counsel") hereby requests leave from the Court to withdraw as an attorney of record for defendant Prona Tools, Inc. ("Prona"). The specific request for withdrawal of attorney Yin Huang does not alter Prona's representation by the Marquis Aurbach Coffing firm or the Zuber Lawler & Del Duca LLP firm. Counsel Chad Clement and Alan C. Chen, whose pro hac vice was granted by this Court, will continue to represent Prona.
II. REASON FOR SEEKING WITHDRAWAL
Counsel seeks to withdraw from representing Prona because Prona is already represented by attorney Alan C. Chen, who is a member of the same firm as Counsel. Counsel's withdrawal would allow Prona to proceed in the current litigation without incurring additional and unnecessary expense. This request has no impact on the current proceedings or any hearings. In addition, discovery has not formally commenced and no trial date has been set.
III. NOTICE OF CLIENT AND OPPOSING COUNSEL
Pursuant to Local Rule IA 11-6(b) of this Court, Counsel has served a notice of withdrawal on Prona and on opposing counsel. Respectfully submitted,
Source: Leagle
