Pilot Inc. v. Coolman Outdoor Corp., 5:18-cv-02286-JAK-SP. (2019)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20190412761
Visitors: 6
Filed: Apr. 10, 2019
Latest Update: Apr. 10, 2019
Summary: JUDGMENT JOHN A. KRONSTADT , District Judge . Judgment is hereby entered in favor of Plaintiff Pilot Inc. and against Defendant Coolman Outdoor Corp. on Plaintiff's claim for Patent Infringement, through the following injunctive relief: Defendant, its agents, servants, employees and all persons acting under its authority, direction, or control as well as all persons knowingly acting in concert or participation with any of them and who have been served with notice of this Judgment, are enjo
Summary: JUDGMENT JOHN A. KRONSTADT , District Judge . Judgment is hereby entered in favor of Plaintiff Pilot Inc. and against Defendant Coolman Outdoor Corp. on Plaintiff's claim for Patent Infringement, through the following injunctive relief: Defendant, its agents, servants, employees and all persons acting under its authority, direction, or control as well as all persons knowingly acting in concert or participation with any of them and who have been served with notice of this Judgment, are enjoi..
More
JUDGMENT
JOHN A. KRONSTADT, District Judge.
Judgment is hereby entered in favor of Plaintiff Pilot Inc. and against Defendant Coolman Outdoor Corp. on Plaintiff's claim for Patent Infringement, through the following injunctive relief:
Defendant, its agents, servants, employees and all persons acting under its authority, direction, or control as well as all persons knowingly acting in concert or participation with any of them and who have been served with notice of this Judgment, are enjoined from manufacturing, importing for sale, selling, and offering for sale vehicle steps that infringe U.S. Design Patent No. D658,559.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
