Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Shekarlab v. County of Sacramento, 2:18-CV-00047-JAM-EFB. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20190624811 Visitors: 12
Filed: Jun. 20, 2019
Latest Update: Jun. 20, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL AND ORDER JOHN A. MENDEZ , District Judge . Plaintiff RAMIN A. SHEKARLAB and Defendant COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO have resolved this case in its entirety. Therefore, the parties stipulate to a dismissal of this action with prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Each party shall bear its own litigation costs and attorney's fees. It is so stipulated. Dated June 30, 2019 LONGYEAR, O'DEA & LAVRA, LLP By: /s/Van Longyear
More

STIPULATION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL AND ORDER

Plaintiff RAMIN A. SHEKARLAB and Defendant COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO have resolved this case in its entirety. Therefore, the parties stipulate to a dismissal of this action with prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii).

Each party shall bear its own litigation costs and attorney's fees.

It is so stipulated.

Dated June 30, 2019 LONGYEAR, O'DEA & LAVRA, LLP By: /s/Van Longyear VAN LONGYEAR NICOLE M. CAHILL Attorneys for Defendant, COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO Dated: June 20, 2019. LAW OFFICES OF STEWART A. KATZ By: /s/Stewart A. Katz (As Authorized 6-20-19) STEWART A. KATZ Attorney for Plaintiff, RAMIN A. SHEKARLAB

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer