JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS HAYNES INVESTMENTS AND L. STEVEN HAYNES TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT

WILLIAM H. ORRICK, District Judge.

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1(b) and Local Rule 6-2, Plaintiffs Kimetra Brice, Earl Browne, and Jill Novorot ("Plaintiffs") and Defendants Haynes Investments, LLC and L. Stephen Haynes (collectively, the "Haynes Defendants"), by and through their respective counsel, respectfully submit the following stipulation:

WHEREAS,

1. On October 10, 2018, the Haynes Defendants filed and served their Motion to Dismiss Complaint on jurisdictional grounds ("Motion to Dismiss");

2. Upon stipulated requests under Local Rule 6-1(b), the Court granted two extensions of time to Plaintiffs to file their Opposition to the Haynes Defendants' Motion to Dismiss [ECF Nos. 96, 100];

3. After resolving a discovery dispute, the Court then issued its December 3, 2018 Order, requiring the Haynes Defendants to produce certain discovery and providing Plaintiffs twenty days following review of said discovery to file their Opposition papers if Plaintiffs deemed they had sufficient discovery to oppose the Motion, and the Haynes Defendants would have seven days after the Opposition deadline to file their reply brief;

4. On December 28, 2018, Plaintiffs filed a notice that they had sufficient discovery to file an Opposition;

5. On January 10, 2019, the Court granted Plaintiffs' Administrative Motion for Leave to Extend Plaintiffs' Opposition Page Limit by ten pages to a total of 35 pages, which the Haynes Defendants did not oppose;

6. Plaintiffs filed their 35-page Opposition to Haynes Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Complaint on January 11, 2019;

7. Pursuant to the Court's prior December 3, 2018 Order, the Haynes Defendants currently must submit their Reply brief within seven days of the deadline for Plaintiffs' Opposition or by January 18, 2019;

8. The Haynes Defendants require additional time to review and respond to the longer-than-usual Opposition and extensive attached evidence;

9. Counsel for Plaintiffs and the Haynes Defendants have conferred and agree that the deadline for the Haynes Defendants to file their Reply in support of their Motion to Dismiss Complaint should be extended one week to January 25, 2019;

10. The Motion to Dismiss hearing date currently set for February 20, 2019 shall remain unaltered;

11. Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(b), a Court order is necessary to extend the briefing schedule;

12. Other than the change to the Reply deadline, this change will not alter the date of any event or deadline already fixed by Court order;

THEREFORE, IT IS NOW HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the undersigned, by and through their attorneys of record that:

ATTESTATION

I, Anna C. Haac, am the ECF user whose ID and password authorized the filing of this document. Under Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that all signatories to this document have concurred in this filing.

PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.