Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Jonathan Wayne Mundo v. John Doe, CV 15-02511-AB (PLA). (2018)

Court: District Court, C.D. California Number: infdco20180110779 Visitors: 5
Filed: Jan. 09, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 09, 2018
Summary: PROTECTIVE ORDER: USE OF FORCE REPORT PAUL L. ABRAMS , Magistrate Judge . Defendant Sheriff McMahon, in his official capacity only, submits the following stipulation and protective order in relation to plaintiff's request for production of documents seeking disclosure of privileged and confidential Sheriff's Department reports related to this case. Defendant claims the documents are protected by, inter alia, the official information privilege, attorney work product and attorney-client pri
More

PROTECTIVE ORDER: USE OF FORCE REPORT

Defendant Sheriff McMahon, in his official capacity only, submits the following stipulation and protective order in relation to plaintiff's request for production of documents seeking disclosure of privileged and confidential Sheriff's Department reports related to this case. Defendant claims the documents are protected by, inter alia, the official information privilege, attorney work product and attorney-client privileges. Pursuant to a court order filed on January 3, 2018, and in order to facilitate discovery while protecting defendants' interests: Case 5:15-cv-02511-AB-PLA Document 203 Filed 01/09/18 Page 2 of 3 Page ID #:1369

1. This protective order applies to the Use of Force Report, approved by the commander on July 12, 2012, and identified on defendants' privilege log as item #1.

2. Documents, records and information ("Confidential Material") disclosed pursuant to this protective order, will be designated consecutively by page numbers and each page will be marked "CONFIDENTIAL-UNLAWFUL TO DUPLICATE."

3. The Confidential Material may be disclosed to plaintiff MUNDO. Excluding the Court (including court reporters, stenographic reporters and videographers, and court personnel), the Confidential Material may not be provided to any other person without the prior written stipulation of defendant or authorization from the Court.

4. Disclosure to Plaintiff's designated expert requires Plaintiff to provide defendants twenty-one (21) actual days of advanced notice in order for defendants to draft an additional stipulated protective order, if required, or request a court order further limiting disclosure.

5. The Confidential Material shall be used solely in connection with this litigation and not for any other litigation. To the extent the Confidential Material is disclosed at any deposition, it is subject to the terms of this protective order.

6. Each party shall take reasonable precaution to prevent the unauthorized or inadvertent disclosure or any of the protected information or documents. Disclosure of the Confidential Material pursuant to this protective order will not constitute a general waiver by defendant(s) of the privileges asserted as to the Confidential Material or related confidential material or records.

7. All documents subject to this Protective Order that are submitted to the Court or used in any pretrial proceeding before this Court shall remain confidential and shall be accorded in camera treatment.

8. The provisions of this Protective Order shall survive and remain in full force and effect after the Entry of Final Judgment, including any appellate Case 5:15-cv-02511-AB-PLA Document 203 Filed 01/09/18 Page 3 of 3 Page ID #:1370 proceedings) in this case, whether by settlement or litigation.

9. At the termination of this litigation, all Confidential Material governed by the provisions of this protective order (including any copies) shall be returned to counsel for defendant(s).

10. The Court shall retain jurisdiction, even after this lawsuit terminates, (a) to make such amendments, modifications and additions to this Protective Order as it may from time to time deem appropriate upon good cause shown and (b) to adjudicate any dispute respecting improper use or disclosure of confidential material.

11. This Protective Order may be executed in counterparts.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer