Filed: Jan. 07, 2019
Latest Update: Jan. 07, 2019
Summary: JUDGMENT OTIS D. WRIGHT, II , District Judge . JUDGMENT On August 21, 2017, Plaintiff IP Global Investments America, Inc. ("Plaintiff" or "IP Global") filed a Complaint against Defendants Body Glove IP Holdings, LP ("BGH") and Marquee Brands, LLC ("Marquee"; collectively "Defendants"). On December 18, 2017, Defendant BGH Counterclaimed against Plaintiff. The Court GRANTED, in part, Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, ECF No. 67, as to BGH's first counterclaim. (Order, ECF
Summary: JUDGMENT OTIS D. WRIGHT, II , District Judge . JUDGMENT On August 21, 2017, Plaintiff IP Global Investments America, Inc. ("Plaintiff" or "IP Global") filed a Complaint against Defendants Body Glove IP Holdings, LP ("BGH") and Marquee Brands, LLC ("Marquee"; collectively "Defendants"). On December 18, 2017, Defendant BGH Counterclaimed against Plaintiff. The Court GRANTED, in part, Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, ECF No. 67, as to BGH's first counterclaim. (Order, ECF N..
More
JUDGMENT
OTIS D. WRIGHT, II, District Judge.
JUDGMENT
On August 21, 2017, Plaintiff IP Global Investments America, Inc. ("Plaintiff" or "IP Global") filed a Complaint against Defendants Body Glove IP Holdings, LP ("BGH") and Marquee Brands, LLC ("Marquee"; collectively "Defendants"). On December 18, 2017, Defendant BGH Counterclaimed against Plaintiff.
The Court GRANTED, in part, Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, ECF No. 67, as to BGH's first counterclaim. (Order, ECF No. 159.) The Court DISMISSED with prejudice BGH's second and fifth counterclaims and DISMISSED without prejudice BGH's remaining counterclaims. (Order, ECF No. 195.) On November 27, 2018, through November 30, 2018, Plaintiff tried its case to a jury. On November 30, 2018, the Court GRANTED Defendants' oral Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law as to Plaintiff's fifth and sixth claims for relief. On November 30, 2018, the jury returned a verdict in favor of Defendants as to Plaintiff's remaining claims for relief. (Jury Verdict, ECF No. 180.)
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED:
1. Plaintiff shall take nothing by its Complaint against Defendants;
2. Judgment is entered in favor of Defendant BGH on Plaintiff's first and second claims for relief;
3. Judgment is entered in favor of Defendant Marquee on Plaintiff's third claim for relief;
4. Judgment is entered in favor of Defendants BGH and Marquee on Plaintiff's fourth, fifth, and sixth claims for relief;
5. Plaintiff's seventh claim for declaratory relief is denied as moot;
6. Defendants shall take nothing by their counterclaims against Plaintiff;
7. Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff on Defendant BGH's first counterclaim;
8. Defendant BGH's second and fifth counterclaims are dismissed with prejudice; and
9. Defendant BGH's third, fourth, sixth, seventh, and eighth counterclaims are dismissed without prejudice.
The Clerk of the Court shall close the case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
