Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Fowler v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 4:17-cv-02092-HSG. (2018)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20180227823 Visitors: 4
Filed: Feb. 26, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 26, 2018
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION FOR SECOND EXTENSION OF STAY OF DEADLINES IN SCHEDULING ORDER AND [PROPOSED] ORDER HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. , District Judge . Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, Plaintiff Vana Fowler and Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., hereby stipulate through their respective counsel of record as follows: WHEREAS, on November 17, 2017, the Court issued an Order staying the case pending mediation on January 15, 2018 ("Stay Order") [D.E. 57]; WHEREAS, the Parties mediated
More

JOINT STIPULATION FOR SECOND EXTENSION OF STAY OF DEADLINES IN SCHEDULING ORDER AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, Plaintiff Vana Fowler and Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., hereby stipulate through their respective counsel of record as follows:

WHEREAS, on November 17, 2017, the Court issued an Order staying the case pending mediation on January 15, 2018 ("Stay Order") [D.E. 57];

WHEREAS, the Parties mediated this case before Hon. Daniel Weinstein (Ret.) on January 15, 2018;

WHEREAS, the Parties did not fully resolve the case, but made sufficient progress at mediation that they requested an extension of the stay through February 23, 2018 to continue settlement negotiations, and the Court entered an Order extending the stay on January 19, 2018 [D.E. 66];

WHEREAS, the Parties remain in ongoing discussions regarding the terms of a potential settlement and need to pull additional information and data to continue the settlement discussions;

WHEREAS, the Parties request a final, thirty-day extension of the stay to continue settlement discussions without the added expense of litigation and discovery;

WHEREAS, the Parties will submit a proposed briefing scheduling if a class settlement is reached, or a scheduling order to address any deadlines affected by the stay if settlement negotiations reach an impasse, by March 26, 2018;

NOW THEREFORE the parties through their undersigned counsel hereby stipulate to, and respectfully request the Court to order, that the stay of the case be extended through March 26, 2018.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer