Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

USA v. Calderon, 2:17-cr-118-GEB. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20180116874 Visitors: 3
Filed: Jan. 11, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 11, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. , Senior District Judge . Plaintiff, United States of America, by and through Assistant United States Attorney CAMERON DESMOND and Assistant Federal Defender MIA CRAGER on behalf of defendant IFRAN CALDERON and SHARI RUSK, attorney on behalf of defendant FABIAN ESTRADA, hereby stipulate to continue the status conference from January 12, 2018 to March 23, 2018 at 9:00 a.m. The reasons for this continuance
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE

Plaintiff, United States of America, by and through Assistant United States Attorney CAMERON DESMOND and Assistant Federal Defender MIA CRAGER on behalf of defendant IFRAN CALDERON and SHARI RUSK, attorney on behalf of defendant FABIAN ESTRADA, hereby stipulate to continue the status conference from January 12, 2018 to March 23, 2018 at 9:00 a.m.

The reasons for this continuance are to allow defense counsel time to continue to review discovery with the defendants and to continue investigation. Defense counsel has already notified the Spanish language court interpreter of this request for continuance and will notify her of the new date if the matter is continued.

Based upon the foregoing, the parties agree time under the Speedy Trial Act should be excluded of this order's date through and including March 23, 2018; pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3161 (h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv)[reasonable time to prepare] and General Order 479, Local Code T4 based upon continuity of counsel and defense preparation.

Counsel and the defendants also agree that the ends of justice served by the Court granting this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial.

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, the Court, having received, read, and considered the parties' stipulation, and good cause appearing therefore, adopts the parties' stipulation in its entirety as its order. The Court specifically finds the failure to grant a continuance in this case would deny counsel reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. The Court finds the ends of justice are served by granting the requested continuance and outweigh the best interests of the public and defendant in a speedy trial.

The Court orders the time from the date the parties stipulated, up to and including March 23, 2018, shall be excluded from computation of time within which the trial of this case must be commenced under the Speedy Trial Act, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and(B)(iv) [reasonable time for counsel to prepare] and General Order 479, (Local Code T4). It is further ordered the January 12, 2018 status conference shall be continued until March 23, 2018, at 9:00 a.m.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer