Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. ANDREWS, 14-MJ-70841 NJV. (2014)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20140905884 Visitors: 3
Filed: Aug. 20, 2014
Latest Update: Aug. 20, 2014
Summary: ORDER AND STIPULATION EXCLUDING TIME FROM THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT CALCULATION (18 U.S.C. 3161(h)(8)(A)) AND WAIVING TIME LIMITS UNDER RULE 5.1 LAURELL BEELER, Magistrate Judge. With the agreement of the parties, and with the consent of the defendant, the Court enters this order scheduling an arraignment or preliminary hearing date of September 17, 2014, at 9:30 a.m. before the Magistrate Judge on duty, and documenting the defendant's waiver of the preliminary hearing date under Federal Rule of
More

ORDER AND STIPULATION EXCLUDING TIME FROM THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT CALCULATION (18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A)) AND WAIVING TIME LIMITS UNDER RULE 5.1

LAURELL BEELER, Magistrate Judge.

With the agreement of the parties, and with the consent of the defendant, the Court enters this order scheduling an arraignment or preliminary hearing date of September 17, 2014, at 9:30 a.m. before the Magistrate Judge on duty, and documenting the defendant's waiver of the preliminary hearing date under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 5.1 and the exclusion of time under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(b), from August 19, 2014 to September 17, 2014. The parties agree, and the Court finds and holds, as follows:

1. The defendant is currently out of custody.

2. This matter is currently set for arraignment before Magistrate Judge Beeler on August 19, 2014.

3. The parties are working to resolve this matter, and the government has provided the defendant with initial discovery materials. The government is currently gathering additional materials for production.

4. The defendant agrees to an exclusion of time under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv) to provide reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence.

5. The defendant waives the time limits of Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 5.1 for preliminary hearing.

6. Counsel for the defense believes that postponing the preliminary hearing is in his client's best interest, and that it is not in his client's interest for the United States to indict the case during the normal 28-day timeline established in Rule 5.1.

7. The Court finds that, taking into the account the public interest in the prompt disposition of criminal cases, these grounds are good cause for extending the time limits for a preliminary hearing under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 5.1. Given these circumstances, the Court finds that the ends of justice served by excluding the period from August 19, 2014 to September 17, 2014, outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A).

7. Accordingly, and with the consent of the defendant, the Court:

(1) sets a preliminary hearing date before the duty Magistrate Judge on September 17, 2014, at 9:30 a.m., and

(2) orders that the period from August 19, 2014 to September 17, 2014, be excluded from the time period for preliminary hearings under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 5.1 and from Speedy Trial Act calculations under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer