AGUILAR v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, 2:16-cv-00051-JAM-KJN. (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20160909n71
Visitors: 18
Filed: Sep. 07, 2016
Latest Update: Sep. 07, 2016
Summary: ORDER ON STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) Trial JOHN A. MENDEZ , District Judge . On September 7, 2016, plaintiffs ANDRES AGUILAR and ROSALINDA SANCHEZ along with defendants FORD MOTOR COMPANY and THE HERTZ CORPORATION, entered into a stipulation pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. By the stipulation, the Parties agreed that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed with prejudice in its entirety. Therefore
Summary: ORDER ON STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) Trial JOHN A. MENDEZ , District Judge . On September 7, 2016, plaintiffs ANDRES AGUILAR and ROSALINDA SANCHEZ along with defendants FORD MOTOR COMPANY and THE HERTZ CORPORATION, entered into a stipulation pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. By the stipulation, the Parties agreed that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed with prejudice in its entirety. Therefore,..
More
ORDER ON STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) Trial
JOHN A. MENDEZ, District Judge.
On September 7, 2016, plaintiffs ANDRES AGUILAR and ROSALINDA SANCHEZ along with defendants FORD MOTOR COMPANY and THE HERTZ CORPORATION, entered into a stipulation pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
By the stipulation, the Parties agreed that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed with prejudice in its entirety.
Therefore, good cause having been shown and the parties having stipulated to same, the Court hereby makes the following order:
IT IS ORDERED THAT:
1. This entire action is dismissed with prejudice, and each party shall bear their own fees and costs.
2. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the settlement.
Source: Leagle
