Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

LIPELT v. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, 2:16-cv-02433-WHO. (2017)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20170913e25 Visitors: 10
Filed: Sep. 12, 2017
Latest Update: Sep. 12, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION TO DISMISS ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON WILLIAM H. ORRICK , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and through Plaintiff GERALD LIPELT, and Defendant UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, by and through their counsel of record herein, that the captioned action may be, and hereby is, dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The parties shall bear their own respective attorney fees and costs of su
More

STIPULATION TO DISMISS ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and through Plaintiff GERALD LIPELT, and Defendant UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, by and through their counsel of record herein, that the captioned action may be, and hereby is, dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

The parties shall bear their own respective attorney fees and costs of suit.

Counsel for the filing party hereby attests that concurrence in filing of this document has been obtained by the other signatory to this document. The conformed signature herein shall serve in lieu of their original signatures on this document. Upon order of the Court, this filing party shall produce records which support the concurrence of all signatories to this document.

Filer's Attestation-Local Rule 131(e)

The filing attorney attests that she has obtained concurrence regarding the filing of this document and its content from the signatories to this document.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer