Tye v. County of Los Angeles, 8:17-cv-01831-RGK-KES. (2018)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20181114b44
Visitors: 14
Filed: Nov. 13, 2018
Latest Update: Nov. 13, 2018
Summary: JUDGMENT R. GARY KLAUSNER , District Judge . Pursuant to the Court's Order Accepting the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge, IT IS ADJUDGED that: 1. The claim for damages based on Santobello v. New York , 404 U.S. 257 (1971) and the claim based on violation of procedural due process in the First Amended Complaint are dismissed with prejudice; and 2. All of the other claims in the First Amended Complaint are dismissed without prejudice but without leave to amend
Summary: JUDGMENT R. GARY KLAUSNER , District Judge . Pursuant to the Court's Order Accepting the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge, IT IS ADJUDGED that: 1. The claim for damages based on Santobello v. New York , 404 U.S. 257 (1971) and the claim based on violation of procedural due process in the First Amended Complaint are dismissed with prejudice; and 2. All of the other claims in the First Amended Complaint are dismissed without prejudice but without leave to amend...
More
JUDGMENT
R. GARY KLAUSNER, District Judge.
Pursuant to the Court's Order Accepting the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge, IT IS ADJUDGED that:
1. The claim for damages based on Santobello v. New York, 404 U.S. 257 (1971) and the claim based on violation of procedural due process in the First Amended Complaint are dismissed with prejudice; and
2. All of the other claims in the First Amended Complaint are dismissed without prejudice but without leave to amend.
Source: Leagle
