Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

MOLINA v. D. SCOTT CARUTHERS, PLC, 1:17-cv-01158-DAD-JLT. (2017)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20171023g69 Visitors: 21
Filed: Oct. 19, 2017
Latest Update: Oct. 19, 2017
Summary: ORDER DIRECTING ENTRY OF JUDGMENT DALE A. DROZD , District Judge . On October 5, 2017, defendants filed a notice of offer of judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 68 for $2,001.00, as well as an additional amount for plaintiff's costs and attorneys' fees as allowed by law. (Doc. No. 5.) On October 11, 2017, plaintiff filed a notice of acceptance of the offer of judgment, accepting the offer and noting the issue of attorneys' fees and costs remain pending. (Doc. No. 7.) Rule 68 prov
More

ORDER DIRECTING ENTRY OF JUDGMENT

On October 5, 2017, defendants filed a notice of offer of judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 68 for $2,001.00, as well as an additional amount for plaintiff's costs and attorneys' fees as allowed by law. (Doc. No. 5.) On October 11, 2017, plaintiff filed a notice of acceptance of the offer of judgment, accepting the offer and noting the issue of attorneys' fees and costs remain pending. (Doc. No. 7.) Rule 68 provides that if the defending party makes such an offer of judgment and within fourteen days the opposing party serves a written notice accepting the offer, judgment is to then be entered. Fed. R. Civ. P. 68(a). The parties having timely filed the appropriate documents, the Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment in the amount of $2,001.00 in plaintiff's favor, in accordance with the offer of judgment. The parties are directed to Local Rules 292 and 293 concerning the filing of a bill of costs and a motion for an award of attorneys' fees.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer