Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Greycroft Partners, IV, LP v. Retzer, CV 19-09759 PA (JEMx). (2020)

Court: District Court, C.D. California Number: infdco20200214974 Visitors: 11
Filed: Feb. 12, 2020
Latest Update: Feb. 12, 2020
Summary: JUDGMENT PERCY ANDERSON , District Judge . Pursuant to this Court's February 12, 2020 Order which dismissed plaintiff Greycroft Partners, IV LP's ("Plaintiff") federal securities fraud claim, and declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff's state common law fraud claim, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Plaintiff's federal securities fraud claim is dismissed with prejudice; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the Court declines to exercise sup
More

JUDGMENT

Pursuant to this Court's February 12, 2020 Order which dismissed plaintiff Greycroft Partners, IV LP's ("Plaintiff") federal securities fraud claim, and declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff's state common law fraud claim,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Plaintiff's federal securities fraud claim is dismissed with prejudice;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff's remaining state law claim, and that claim is dismissed without prejudice (See U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3));.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiff take nothing on its federal claim and that defendant Kathryn Retzer shall have her costs of suit pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer