Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Daw v. Berryhill, 3:17-cv-00402-LRH-(VPC). (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20180726d20 Visitors: 12
Filed: Jul. 24, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 24, 2018
Summary: ORDER LARRY R. HICKS , District Judge . Before this Court is the Report and Recommendation of U.S. Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke (ECF No. 18) entered on June 7, 2018, recommending granting plaintiff's Motion for Remand (ECF No. 10) entered on November 13, 2017, and denying defendant's Cross-Motion to Affirm (ECF No. 13) entered on December 19, 2017. On June 18, 2018, defendant filed her Objection to Report and Recommendation that the Court Remand for Further Proceedings (ECF No. 20) and
More

ORDER

Before this Court is the Report and Recommendation of U.S. Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke (ECF No. 18) entered on June 7, 2018, recommending granting plaintiff's Motion for Remand (ECF No. 10) entered on November 13, 2017, and denying defendant's Cross-Motion to Affirm (ECF No. 13) entered on December 19, 2017. On June 18, 2018, defendant filed her Objection to Report and Recommendation that the Court Remand for Further Proceedings (ECF No. 20) and on July 16, 2018, plaintiff filed her Response to Defendant's Objection to Report and Recommendation that the Court Remand for Further Proceedings (ECF No. 23).

The action was referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 1B 1-4 of the Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for the District of Nevada.

The Court has considered defendant's objections, the response of plaintiff and the pleadings and memoranda of the parties and other relevant matters of record pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule IB 3-2. The Court determines that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 18) entered on June 7, 2018, should be adopted and accepted.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 18) entered on June 7, 2018, is ADOPTED and ACCEPTED, and plaintiff's Motion for Remand (ECF No. 10) is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant's Cross-Motion to Affirm (ECF No. 13) is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the court shall enter judgment in this matter.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer