TORRES v. COUNTY OF FRESNO, 1:15-cv-00489-DAD-BAM. (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20161116960
Visitors: 4
Filed: Nov. 14, 2016
Latest Update: Nov. 14, 2016
Summary: ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF THE COURT TO CLOSE THE CASE (Doc. Nos. 32, 37) DALE A. DROZD , District Judge . On November 10, 2016, the parties filed a joint stipulation dismissing the action with prejudice and with all parties bearing their own costs and attorneys' fees. (Doc. No. 37.) In light of the parties' stipulation, this action has been terminated, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688 , 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed with p
Summary: ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF THE COURT TO CLOSE THE CASE (Doc. Nos. 32, 37) DALE A. DROZD , District Judge . On November 10, 2016, the parties filed a joint stipulation dismissing the action with prejudice and with all parties bearing their own costs and attorneys' fees. (Doc. No. 37.) In light of the parties' stipulation, this action has been terminated, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688 , 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed with pr..
More
ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF THE COURT TO CLOSE THE CASE
(Doc. Nos. 32, 37)
DALE A. DROZD, District Judge.
On November 10, 2016, the parties filed a joint stipulation dismissing the action with prejudice and with all parties bearing their own costs and attorneys' fees. (Doc. No. 37.) In light of the parties' stipulation, this action has been terminated, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed with prejudice and without an award of costs or attorneys' fees. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close the case. The pending motion to amend (Doc. No. 32) is terminated as having been rendered moot and all currently scheduled hearings in this action are vacated.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
