Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

DEL RIO v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 3:15-cv-03667-EMC. (2016)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20160115q10 Visitors: 23
Filed: Jan. 15, 2016
Latest Update: Jan. 15, 2016
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING DEFENDANTS' RULE 12(B) MOTION BRIEFING; [PROPOSED] ORDER EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . Pursuant to Rule 6-1(b) of the Local Rules of the United States District for the Northern District of California, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiffs RICARDO DEL RIO and TONY MEHRDAD SAGHEBIAN ("Plaintiffs") and Defendants UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and RASIER-CA, LLC ("Defendants") (collectively, "the Parties"), by and through their attorneys of record: W
More

JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING DEFENDANTS' RULE 12(B) MOTION BRIEFING; [PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to Rule 6-1(b) of the Local Rules of the United States District for the Northern District of California, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiffs RICARDO DEL RIO and TONY MEHRDAD SAGHEBIAN ("Plaintiffs") and Defendants UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and RASIER-CA, LLC ("Defendants") (collectively, "the Parties"), by and through their attorneys of record:

WHEREAS, on December 3, 2015, the Parties filed a Joint Case Management Conference Statement setting forth a briefing schedule on Defendants' Rule 12(b) motion (Dkt. 33);

WHEREAS, the Joint Case Management Conference Statement set the deadline for Defendants' Rule 12(b) motion for January 15, 2016, the opposition deadline for February 12, 2016, and the reply deadline for February 26, 2016;

WHEREAS, the Court did not issue an order confirming the aforementioned deadlines;

WHEREAS, no hearing date has been set for Defendants' Rule 12(b) motion;

WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed to memorialize the briefing deadlines and have agreed to continue the deadlines by one week;

WHEREAS, there has been no previous request to extend the timing for the deadlines associated with Defendants' Rule 12(b) motion; and

WHEREAS, this stipulation will not require the alteration of any dates set by Court.

NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED:

1. That Defendants' deadline to file a Rule 12(b) motion be continued to January 22, 2015;

2. That Plaintiffs' deadline to respond to Defendants' motion be continued to February 22, 2016;

3. That Defendants' deadline to file a reply in support of their motion be continued to March 4, 2016.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer