Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Uniloc USA, Inc. v. Apple Inc., 18-cv-00362-JSW. (2018)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20180208914 Visitors: 17
Filed: Feb. 07, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 07, 2018
Summary: ORDER TO PLAINTIFFS TO SHOW CAUSE RREGARDING SUR-REPLY Re: Dkt. No. 96 JEFFREY S. WHITE , District Judge . On February 7, 2018, Plaintiffs filed a sur-reply without leave from the undersigned to do so, and the Northern District Civil Local Rules do not provide for sur-replies as a matter of right. See N.D. Civ. L.R. 7-3(d). This case was transferred in from tthhe United States District Court from the Eastern District of Texas and involved consolidated proceedings and, thus, the docket in
More

ORDER TO PLAINTIFFS TO SHOW CAUSE RREGARDING SUR-REPLY

Re: Dkt. No. 96

On February 7, 2018, Plaintiffs filed a sur-reply without leave from the undersigned to do so, and the Northern District Civil Local Rules do not provide for sur-replies as a matter of right. See N.D. Civ. L.R. 7-3(d). This case was transferred in from tthhe United States District Court from the Eastern District of Texas and involved consolidated proceedings and, thus, the docket in this case may not be complete.

Accordingly, Plaintiffs are HEREBY ORDDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why the Court should consider their sur-reply. If they were previously granted leave to file a sur-reply to Defendant's motions by the District Court in Texas, they shall provide a copy of that order to the Court. If they were not, they shall show cause why the Court should not strike the sur-reply.

Plaintiffs shall respond to this Order to Show Cause by February 12, 2018.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer