Veasey v. California State University Sacramento, 2:18-cv-2601 TLN AC (PS). (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20190503d11
Visitors: 3
Filed: May 02, 2019
Latest Update: May 02, 2019
Summary: ORDER ALLISON CLAIRE , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se. The action was accordingly referred to the undersigned by Local Rule 302(c)(21). On February 15, 2019, defendants filed a motion to dismiss. ECF No. 10. The motion came on for hearing on On May 1, 2019. Plaintiff appeared in person, and defense counsel appeared telephonically. At the hearing, plaintiff referenced defendant CSUS's response, through it's Equal Employment Opportunity ("EEO") Office, to an
Summary: ORDER ALLISON CLAIRE , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se. The action was accordingly referred to the undersigned by Local Rule 302(c)(21). On February 15, 2019, defendants filed a motion to dismiss. ECF No. 10. The motion came on for hearing on On May 1, 2019. Plaintiff appeared in person, and defense counsel appeared telephonically. At the hearing, plaintiff referenced defendant CSUS's response, through it's Equal Employment Opportunity ("EEO") Office, to an E..
More
ORDER
ALLISON CLAIRE, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se. The action was accordingly referred to the undersigned by Local Rule 302(c)(21). On February 15, 2019, defendants filed a motion to dismiss. ECF No. 10. The motion came on for hearing on On May 1, 2019. Plaintiff appeared in person, and defense counsel appeared telephonically. At the hearing, plaintiff referenced defendant CSUS's response, through it's Equal Employment Opportunity ("EEO") Office, to an Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ("EEOC") investigation into his administrative complaint. Because this document and others related to the EEOC investigation may bear on the resolution of this matter, IT IS ORDERED that within 7 days of this order, plaintiff shall file with the court: (1) a copy of his May 13, 2016 administrative complaint filed with the California Department of Fair Employment and Housing, and (2) documents related to any subsequent EEOC investigation, including the CSUS EEO Office response described at the hearing. Upon receipt of these documents, the court will take the motion under further review.
Source: Leagle
