ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

LARRY ALAN BURNS, District Judge.

John W. Wyskiver challenges the denial of his claim for disability benefits under the Social Security Act. The challenge was referred to Magistrate Judge Bartick for a Report and Recommendation ("R & R") pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, after which Wyskiver and the Commissioner filed cross-motions for summary judgement. On March 14, 2016, Judge Bartick issued his R & R, finding that Wyskiver's summary judgment motion should be granted, the Commissioner's summary judgment motion should be denied and the case should be remanded for further administrative proceedings. No objections were filed.

A district court has jurisdiction to review a Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation on dispositive matters. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). "The district judge must determine de novo any part of the magistrate judge's disposition that has been properly objected to." Id. "A judge of the court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendation made by the magistrate judge." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

Under both the Standing Order of the undersigned Judge and the Local Rules of the Court, the failure to file an objection to a motion may be construed as consent to the motion being granted — and the Court extends this to the failure to file an objection to a R & R. Local Rule 7.1(f)(3)(c). The Court has reviewed Judge Bartick's thorough R & R and finds it is correct. It is ADOPTED.

Plaintiff's motion for summary judgement is therefore GRANTED, Defendant's motion for summary judgement is DENIED and the case is REMANDED for further administrative proceedings.

IT IS SO ORDERED.