Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Sidibe v. Sutter Health, 12-cv-04854-LB. (2018)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20180904892
Filed: Aug. 31, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 31, 2018
Summary: ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE NON-PARTY COMMUNITY HOSPITAL OF THE MONTEREY PENINSULA'S MOTION TO QUASH Re: ECF No. 392, 401 LAUREL BEELER , Magistrate Judge . The court has received non-party Community Hospital of the Monterey Peninsula's motion to quash defendant Sutter Health's subpoena 1 and the parties' stipulation and proposed order regarding a briefing schedule for the motion. 2 The court denies the motion to quash without prejudice and orders Sutter Health and Community Hospital
More

ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE NON-PARTY COMMUNITY HOSPITAL OF THE MONTEREY PENINSULA'S MOTION TO QUASH

Re: ECF No. 392, 401

The court has received non-party Community Hospital of the Monterey Peninsula's motion to quash defendant Sutter Health's subpoena1 and the parties' stipulation and proposed order regarding a briefing schedule for the motion.2 The court denies the motion to quash without prejudice and orders Sutter Health and Community Hospital to comply with the dispute procedures in the undersigned's standing order.3 The procedures in it require, among other things, that if a meet-and-confer by other means does not resolve the parties' dispute, lead counsel for the parties must meet and confer in person (if counsel are local) and then submit a joint letter brief with information about any unresolved disputes. The letter brief must be filed under the Civil Events category of "Motions and Related Filings > Motions — General > Discovery Letter Brief." After reviewing the joint letter brief, the court will evaluate whether further proceedings are necessary, including any further briefing or argument. The court terminates the stipulation and proposed order as moot.

For clarification, for the purposes of third-party subpoenas and discovery disputes, the court's standing order's instructions to "parties" is meant to refer to the participants in a third-party discovery dispute (even if they are not formal parties to the underlying litigation). The court views the joint letter brief process as a more efficient process than motion-to-quash briefing for parties to (1) talk with each other, see each other's positions, try to find areas of compromise, and work out disputes amongst themselves, and (2) narrow, sharpen, and focus the issues they cannot resolve before they present those issues to the court. See Synopsys, Inc. v. Ubiquiti Networks, Inc., No. 17-cv-00561-WHO (LB), 2018 WL 2294281, at *1 (N.D. Cal. May 21, 2018). The court hopes that parties (and third parties) approach the process in good faith from that perspective.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. Mot. to Quash — ECF No. 392. Citations refer to material in the Electronic Case File ("ECF"); pinpoint citations are to the ECF-generated page numbers at the top of documents.
2. Stipulation — ECF No. 401.
3. Standing Order — ECF No. 113-1.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer