AMEDEE v. CITIMORTGAGE, INC., 13-cv-03040-VC. (2014)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20140523739
Visitors: 9
Filed: May 22, 2014
Latest Update: May 22, 2014
Summary: ORDER VINCE CHHABRIA, District Judge. On April 14, 2014, the defendant filed a motion to dismiss and a motion to strike. (Docket Nos. 42 and 43). The plaintiff's responses were due April 28, 2014. As of the date of this Order, the Court has not received any response from the plaintiff. Accordingly, the plaintiff is directed to file a response within ten days of this Order, or the case will be dismissed for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). IT IS SO ORDERE
Summary: ORDER VINCE CHHABRIA, District Judge. On April 14, 2014, the defendant filed a motion to dismiss and a motion to strike. (Docket Nos. 42 and 43). The plaintiff's responses were due April 28, 2014. As of the date of this Order, the Court has not received any response from the plaintiff. Accordingly, the plaintiff is directed to file a response within ten days of this Order, or the case will be dismissed for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). IT IS SO ORDERED..
More
ORDER
VINCE CHHABRIA, District Judge.
On April 14, 2014, the defendant filed a motion to dismiss and a motion to strike. (Docket Nos. 42 and 43). The plaintiff's responses were due April 28, 2014. As of the date of this Order, the Court has not received any response from the plaintiff. Accordingly, the plaintiff is directed to file a response within ten days of this Order, or the case will be dismissed for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
