Filed: Nov. 08, 2012
Latest Update: Nov. 08, 2012
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME UNDER PATENT LOCAL RULES HOWARD R. LLOYD, Magistrate Judge. Parties Joint Stipulation To Extend Time To Comply With Patent Local Rules — Plaintiff Tetsuya "Joe" Nomura ("Plaintiff") and Defendants Amazon, Inc. and YouTube, Inc. ("Defendants") file this Joint Stipulation to Extend Time to Comply with Patent Local Rule 4-5(c). On Monday, October 29, 2012 Defendants filed their opposition to Plaintiff's initial claim construction brief and included several revi
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME UNDER PATENT LOCAL RULES HOWARD R. LLOYD, Magistrate Judge. Parties Joint Stipulation To Extend Time To Comply With Patent Local Rules — Plaintiff Tetsuya "Joe" Nomura ("Plaintiff") and Defendants Amazon, Inc. and YouTube, Inc. ("Defendants") file this Joint Stipulation to Extend Time to Comply with Patent Local Rule 4-5(c). On Monday, October 29, 2012 Defendants filed their opposition to Plaintiff's initial claim construction brief and included several revis..
More
JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME UNDER PATENT LOCAL RULES
HOWARD R. LLOYD, Magistrate Judge.
Parties Joint Stipulation To Extend Time To Comply With Patent Local Rules —
Plaintiff Tetsuya "Joe" Nomura ("Plaintiff") and Defendants Amazon, Inc. and YouTube, Inc. ("Defendants") file this Joint Stipulation to Extend Time to Comply with Patent Local Rule 4-5(c).
On Monday, October 29, 2012 Defendants filed their opposition to Plaintiff's initial claim construction brief and included several revised claim constructions and new extrinsic evidence. As such, Plaintiff has requested a one week extension to prepare and file its reply and a five page extension from fifteen to twenty pages. Defendants have agreed to this request.
Currently, as per the Docket No. 73 of June 15, 2012, Plaintiffs claim construction reply brief is due Monday, November 5, 2012. Specifically, the Parties request a seven day extension to comply with P.L.R. 4-5(c). The proposed new deadline to comply with P.L. R. 4-5(c) will be November 12, 2012.
The Parties request the extension in good faith to accommodate scheduling and staffing concerns. All other deadlines remain the same.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between counsel and subject to the approval of the Court, that the parties, having met and conferred, agree to the following:
• The deadline to comply with P.L.R. 4-5(c) is extended to Monday, November 12, 2012.
• The page limit for the reply brief shall be twenty (20) pages.
Prayer for Relief
For these reasons this court should extend the time for the parties to comply with P.L.R. 4-5(c) to November 12, 2012, respectively.
IT IS SO ORDERED.