King v. United States of America, 17-cv-06709-DMR. (2017)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20171221b17
Visitors: 26
Filed: Dec. 20, 2017
Latest Update: Dec. 20, 2017
Summary: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE DONNA M. RYU , Magistrate Judge . Defendant United States of America filed a Motion to Dismiss on November 28, 2017. [Docket No. 8]. Currently, the motion is set for a court hearing on January 11, 2018. Plaintiff LeBaron King is pursuing this action without legal representation. According to the local court rules, Mr. King should have filed any brief in opposition to Defendant's motion by December 12, 2017. See Civ. L.R. 7-3(a). The court has received no such oppositio
Summary: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE DONNA M. RYU , Magistrate Judge . Defendant United States of America filed a Motion to Dismiss on November 28, 2017. [Docket No. 8]. Currently, the motion is set for a court hearing on January 11, 2018. Plaintiff LeBaron King is pursuing this action without legal representation. According to the local court rules, Mr. King should have filed any brief in opposition to Defendant's motion by December 12, 2017. See Civ. L.R. 7-3(a). The court has received no such opposition..
More
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
DONNA M. RYU, Magistrate Judge.
Defendant United States of America filed a Motion to Dismiss on November 28, 2017. [Docket No. 8]. Currently, the motion is set for a court hearing on January 11, 2018. Plaintiff LeBaron King is pursuing this action without legal representation. According to the local court rules, Mr. King should have filed any brief in opposition to Defendant's motion by December 12, 2017. See Civ. L.R. 7-3(a). The court has received no such opposition.
The court ORDERS Mr. King to respond by January 2, 2018 and explain his failure to respond to the motion. In addition, Mr. King must simultaneously (1) submit his opposition to the court or (2) file a statement of non-opposition to the motion. This order to show cause does not indicate that the court will necessarily accept Mr. King's late submission. If Mr. King does not respond by January 2, 2018, Defendant's motion may be granted or the case may be dismissed for failure to prosecute.
The court further ORDERS that Defendant shall file a reply, if any, to Mr. King's opposition no later than January 9, 2017.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
