Filed: Jan. 29, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 29, 2018
Summary: ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S "REQUEST FOR TEMPORARY ORDERS" (Doc. No. 59) ANTHONY W. ISHII , Senior District Judge . Mahdu Sameer, appearing pro se, has alleged multiple causes of action against multiple Defendants arising from a dispute over the failure to deliver her personal possessions from her former residence in Fresno, CA to her current residence in New Zealand. Sameer has alleged, among other things, that the Defendants have conspired to convert over $300,000 of her property. In her 106
Summary: ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S "REQUEST FOR TEMPORARY ORDERS" (Doc. No. 59) ANTHONY W. ISHII , Senior District Judge . Mahdu Sameer, appearing pro se, has alleged multiple causes of action against multiple Defendants arising from a dispute over the failure to deliver her personal possessions from her former residence in Fresno, CA to her current residence in New Zealand. Sameer has alleged, among other things, that the Defendants have conspired to convert over $300,000 of her property. In her 106-..
More
ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S "REQUEST FOR TEMPORARY ORDERS"
(Doc. No. 59)
ANTHONY W. ISHII, Senior District Judge.
Mahdu Sameer, appearing pro se, has alleged multiple causes of action against multiple Defendants arising from a dispute over the failure to deliver her personal possessions from her former residence in Fresno, CA to her current residence in New Zealand. Sameer has alleged, among other things, that the Defendants have conspired to convert over $300,000 of her property.
In her 106-page "Request for Temporary Orders," Sameer alleges that Defendant Conroy Removals, conspiring with other Defendants in this case, have used the adjudicative processes of the New Zealand court system to obtain a judgment against her "through fraud, perjury and false representation." Sameer then alleges Conroy Removals "filed a notice of bankruptcy against me" in New Zealand, seeking possession of the goods they allegedly have retained; a hearing in this latter action is, as alleged, scheduled for March 26th, 2018 in a New Zealand tribunal.
Sameer then requests this Court "make a finding that the orders of the [New Zealand] court were acquired through fraud, deceit, forgery/fabrication of evidence," and also "declare the [New Zealand Judgments] null and void. . . ." However, Sameer cites to no authority under which the Court would be able to grant such orders, and so Sameer's request is denied.
Sameer also requests the Court "order Conroy Removals to release my goods pending payment/resolution of the case," and "order defendant Talbot to have the damage assessed." Again, however, Sameer offers no authority under which the Court might grant her request at this time, and so her request is denied.1
ORDER
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Plaintiff's "Request for Temporary Orders" is DENIED; and
2. The remainder of this case is referred back to the magistrate judge for further proceedings.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
