ALTMIRE v. BABCOCK & WILCOX POWER GENERATION GROUP, INC., 10-908. (2012)
Court: District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20120523e09
Visitors: 11
Filed: May 22, 2012
Latest Update: May 22, 2012
Summary: ORDER ROBERT C. MITCHELL, District Judge. Plaintiffs have filed documents entitled "Plaintiffs' Objections to the April 4, 2012 Order of Magistrate Judge Mitchell Denying Plaintiffs' Motion to Determine Standards and Procedures for Adjudication of the Sufficiency of Plaintiffs' Prima Facie Materials" [document #121] and "Plaintiffs' Objections to the April 4, 2012 Order of Magistrate Judge Mitchell Denying Plaintiffs' Motion to Consolidate for Adjudication of the Sufficiency of Plaintiffs' Pri
Summary: ORDER ROBERT C. MITCHELL, District Judge. Plaintiffs have filed documents entitled "Plaintiffs' Objections to the April 4, 2012 Order of Magistrate Judge Mitchell Denying Plaintiffs' Motion to Determine Standards and Procedures for Adjudication of the Sufficiency of Plaintiffs' Prima Facie Materials" [document #121] and "Plaintiffs' Objections to the April 4, 2012 Order of Magistrate Judge Mitchell Denying Plaintiffs' Motion to Consolidate for Adjudication of the Sufficiency of Plaintiffs' Prim..
More
ORDER
ROBERT C. MITCHELL, District Judge.
Plaintiffs have filed documents entitled "Plaintiffs' Objections to the April 4, 2012 Order of Magistrate Judge Mitchell Denying Plaintiffs' Motion to Determine Standards and Procedures for Adjudication of the Sufficiency of Plaintiffs' Prima Facie Materials" [document #121] and "Plaintiffs' Objections to the April 4, 2012 Order of Magistrate Judge Mitchell Denying Plaintiffs' Motion to Consolidate for Adjudication of the Sufficiency of Plaintiffs' Prima Facie Materials" [document #123], which the Court will construe as appeals of both the non-dispositive order [document #119] and text-only order entered April 4, 2012. Upon a review of the matters raised by the appeals, the Court concludes that the orders appealed from are neither clearly erroneous nor contrary to law. Fed.R.Civ.P. 72.
Therefore, this 22 day of May, 2012, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above referenced objections are OVERRULED, the orders of April 4, 2012 are AFFIRMED, and the instant case is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings.
Source: Leagle
