Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

OPHCA, LLC v. City of Berkeley, 3:16-cv-03046-CRB. (2017)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20171215986 Visitors: 15
Filed: Dec. 14, 2017
Latest Update: Dec. 14, 2017
Summary: RULE 41 STIPULATION TO DISMISS ENTIRE ACTION: ORDER CHARLES R. BREYER , District Judge . Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41, the undersigned parties hereby stipulate as follows: WHEREAS, in February 2017, Plaintiffs filed a related action in the California Superior Court, County of Alameda: OPHCA, LLC vs. City of Berkeley, Case No. RG17850595 (State Court Action); WHEREAS, on November 29, 2017, the California Superior Court entered judgment in the State Court Action and that
More

RULE 41 STIPULATION TO DISMISS ENTIRE ACTION: ORDER

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41, the undersigned parties hereby stipulate as follows:

WHEREAS, in February 2017, Plaintiffs filed a related action in the California Superior Court, County of Alameda: OPHCA, LLC vs. City of Berkeley, Case No. RG17850595 (State Court Action);

WHEREAS, on November 29, 2017, the California Superior Court entered judgment in the State Court Action and that judgment resolves the claims in this action;

WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to dismiss this action in light of the resolution reached in the State Court Action;

WHEREAS, no party shall be entitled to recover fees or costs based on the dismissal of this action;

NOW, THEREFORE, the undersigned parties ask that the Court dismiss Plaintiffs' complaint with prejudice.

ECF ATTESTATION

I, Navi Singh Dhillon, hereby attest that Farimah Brown concurs in this filing. This attestation is made pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer