Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Pettit v. Procter & Gamble Company, 3:15-cv-02150-RS. (2016)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20160830920 Visitors: 6
Filed: Aug. 29, 2016
Latest Update: Aug. 29, 2016
Summary: ORDER JOINT STIPULATION TO SET CLASS CERTIFICATION BRIEFING SCHEDULE RICHARD SEEBORG , District Judge . Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-1(b), 6-2, 7-12, and the Minute Entry issued after the hearing on defendant The Procter & Gamble Company's ("P&G") motion to stay this case ( see Dkt. No. 36), plaintiff Jamie Pettit and P&G respectfully submit this joint stipulation to set the briefing schedule for class certification. WHEREAS, at the August 13, 2015 Case Management Conference and in a subsequ
More

ORDER

JOINT STIPULATION TO SET CLASS CERTIFICATION BRIEFING SCHEDULE

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-1(b), 6-2, 7-12, and the Minute Entry issued after the hearing on defendant The Procter & Gamble Company's ("P&G") motion to stay this case (see Dkt. No. 36), plaintiff Jamie Pettit and P&G respectfully submit this joint stipulation to set the briefing schedule for class certification.

WHEREAS, at the August 13, 2015 Case Management Conference and in a subsequent order, this Court set an initial briefing schedule for Plaintiff's motion for class certification (see Dkt. No. 24);

WHEREAS, the parties filed joint stipulations on three subsequent occasions to extend the schedule for class certification, each of which was entered by the Court (see Dkt. Nos. 27, 29, and 31);

WHEREAS, the last such stipulation (see Dkt. No. 31) was entered on June 23, 2016 and provided that Plaintiff would file her motion for class certification by October 20, 2016; P&G would depose Plaintiff's class certification expert(s) by November 3, 2016; P&G would file its opposition by December 8, 2016; Plaintiff would depose P&G's class certification expert(s) by December 22, 2016; Plaintiff would file her reply by January 12, 2017; and the hearing would be held at 1:30 p.m. on February 2, 2017;

WHEREAS, P&G filed a motion to stay this action on June 23, 2016, which was set for a hearing on July 21, 2016 (see Dkt. No. 32);

WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the hearing on P&G's motion, the Court denied P&G's motion without prejudice, and requested that the parties submit a new schedule for class certification that would extend the current schedule by approximately three months;

NOW THEREFORE, THE PARTIES BY COUNSEL HEREBY STIPULATE as follows:

Plaintiff shall file her motion for class certification by February 14, 2017; P&G shall depose Plaintiff's class certification expert(s) by February 28, 2017; P&G shall file its opposition by March 28, 2017; Plaintiff shall depose P&G's class certification expert(s) by April 11, 2017; Plaintiff shall file her reply by April 25, 2017; and the hearing shall be held at 1:30 p.m. on May 18, 2017, or another date convenient for the Court.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, AND FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, THE COURT ORDERS AS FOLLOWS:

Plaintiff shall file her motion for class certification by February 14, 2017; P&G shall depose Plaintiff's class certification expert(s) by February 28, 2017; P&G shall file its opposition by March 28, 2017; Plaintiff shall depose P&G's class certification expert(s) by April 11, 2017; Plaintiff shall file her reply by April 25, 2017; and the hearing shall be held at 1:30 p.m. on May 18, 2017, or another date convenient for the Court.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer