STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SHORTENING TIME TO RESPOND TO ORACLE'S MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER

NATHANAEL M. COUSINS, Magistrate Judge.

WHEREAS, on January 17, 2013, the Court entered a Case Management Scheduling Order (Dkt. 32) in this case. See Declaration of Geoffrey M. Howard ("Howard Decl.") ¶ 2;

WHEREAS, plaintiffs Oracle America, Inc. and Oracle International Corporation (collectively, "Oracle") filed a Motion for Relief from the Case Management Scheduling Order (the "Motion") on July 5, 2013. See Howard Decl. ¶ 3;

WHEREAS, Oracle's Motion requests a modification of outstanding case deadlines in this action, including the close of fact discovery currently scheduled for August 19, 2013. See Howard Decl. ¶¶ 2-3;

WHEREAS, absent an order shortening the motion schedule, Defendant CedarCrestone, Inc.'s ("CedarCrestone") responsive pleading would not be due until July 19, 2013, Oracle's reply pleading would not be due until July 26, 2013, and a potential hearing regarding the Motion would be scheduled for no earlier than August 14, 2013. See Howard Decl. ¶¶ 4-6;

NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE AND REQUEST THE COURT TO ORDER as follows: that CedarCrestone's deadline for filing a response to Oracle's Motion will be July 11, 2013; and that Oracle's deadline for filing a reply pleading will be July 16, 2013. The parties further request that a hearing regarding the Motion, if the Court deems such hearing necessary, be scheduled for the earliest possible date convenient to the Court.

ATTESTATION OF CONCURRENCE IN FILING

Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X.B. regarding non-filing signatories, I hereby attest that I have obtained concurrence from counsel for CedarCrestone in the filing of this document.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.