Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

ESTATE OF CLIFFORD v. PLACER COUNTY, CIV. S-11-2591 LKK/CKD. (2014)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20140527b36 Visitors: 6
Filed: May 23, 2014
Latest Update: May 23, 2014
Summary: ORDER LAWRENCE K. KARLTON, District Judge. On May 5, 2014, this matter came on for oral argument on defendants' motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 21). After oral argument, the decision of the United States Supreme Court in Tolan v. Cotton, ___ S.Ct. ___, 2014 WL 1757856 (May 5, 2014), came to the court's attention. On May 7, 2014, the court issued an order granting the parties ten days in which to file supplemental briefs addressing the application, if any, of the decision in Tolan to t
More

ORDER

LAWRENCE K. KARLTON, District Judge.

On May 5, 2014, this matter came on for oral argument on defendants' motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 21). After oral argument, the decision of the United States Supreme Court in Tolan v. Cotton, ___ S.Ct. ___, 2014 WL 1757856 (May 5, 2014), came to the court's attention. On May 7, 2014, the court issued an order granting the parties ten days in which to file supplemental briefs addressing the application, if any, of the decision in Tolan to the motion at bar.

Defendants filed their supplemental brief on May 13, 2014. On May 22, 2014, plaintiffs filed a supplemental brief accompanied by two declarations. On the same day, defendants filed a response to plaintiffs' supplemental brief, and on May 22, 2014, plaintiffs filed a response to defendants' response. Defendants object to the inclusion of the declarations and the briefing thereon, contending it exceeds the scope of the court's May 7, 2014 order and that said evidence could and therefore should have been filed with plaintiffs' opposition to the motion. Defendants request that the evidence and briefing thereon be stricken. In the alternative, they seek an additional period in which to respond to plaintiffs' additional argument and evidence and to raise specific evidentiary objections thereto.

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendants' request to strike the two declarations filed by plaintiffs on May 22, 2014 and the briefing thereon is denied; and

2. Defendants are granted fifteen days from the date of this order in which to respond to plaintiffs' evidence and argument thereon. Thereafter, defendants' motion for summary judgment will stand submitted and no further briefing shall be filed.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer