U.S. ex rel. Markus v. Aerojet RocketDyne Holdings, Inc., 2:15-cv-02245-WBS-AC. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20180919950
Visitors: 24
Filed: Sep. 18, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 18, 2018
Summary: ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO FURTHER EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS AEROJET ROCKETDYNE HOLDINGS, INC. AND AEROJET ROCKETDYNE, INC. TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT WILLIAM B. SHUBB , District Judge . This matter comes before the Court on the parties Stipulation to Further Extend Time for Defendants Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings, Inc. and Aerojet Rocketdyne, Inc. (hereinafter, "Defendants") to Answer or Otherwise Respond to First Amended Complaint (the "Joint Stipulation"
Summary: ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO FURTHER EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS AEROJET ROCKETDYNE HOLDINGS, INC. AND AEROJET ROCKETDYNE, INC. TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT WILLIAM B. SHUBB , District Judge . This matter comes before the Court on the parties Stipulation to Further Extend Time for Defendants Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings, Inc. and Aerojet Rocketdyne, Inc. (hereinafter, "Defendants") to Answer or Otherwise Respond to First Amended Complaint (the "Joint Stipulation")..
More
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO FURTHER EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS AEROJET ROCKETDYNE HOLDINGS, INC. AND AEROJET ROCKETDYNE, INC. TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
WILLIAM B. SHUBB, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on the parties Stipulation to Further Extend Time for Defendants Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings, Inc. and Aerojet Rocketdyne, Inc. (hereinafter, "Defendants") to Answer or Otherwise Respond to First Amended Complaint (the "Joint Stipulation"). The Court has reviewed the Joint Stipulation and, good cause appearing, GRANTS the Joint Stipulation.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the deadline for Defendants to move, answer or otherwise respond to the Amended Complaint is further extended through and including November 30, 2018.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
