PIRAINO v. WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, 2:16-cv-8705. (2017)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20170127j87
Visitors: 9
Filed: Jan. 26, 2017
Latest Update: Jan. 26, 2017
Summary: ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREJUDICE S. JAMES OTERO , District Judge . Pursuant to the Joint Stipulation for Arbitration and Request for Dismissal by Plaintiff Alexandra Piraino and Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., and GOOD CAUSE APPEARING: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The parties shall submit to binding non-judicial arbitration; 2. The arbitration shall be conducted through the American Arbitration Association; 3. Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)
Summary: ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREJUDICE S. JAMES OTERO , District Judge . Pursuant to the Joint Stipulation for Arbitration and Request for Dismissal by Plaintiff Alexandra Piraino and Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., and GOOD CAUSE APPEARING: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The parties shall submit to binding non-judicial arbitration; 2. The arbitration shall be conducted through the American Arbitration Association; 3. Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(..
More
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREJUDICE
S. JAMES OTERO, District Judge.
Pursuant to the Joint Stipulation for Arbitration and Request for Dismissal by Plaintiff Alexandra Piraino and Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., and GOOD CAUSE APPEARING:
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The parties shall submit to binding non-judicial arbitration;
2. The arbitration shall be conducted through the American Arbitration Association;
3. Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and based on the stipulation submitted by the parties, this action is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and,
4. Each party shall bear its own costs and fees as to this federal court action.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
