Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Bardman, 3:16-cv-02023 (JST). (2018)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20180427d72 Visitors: 12
Filed: Apr. 26, 2018
Latest Update: Apr. 26, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE JON S. TIGAR , District Judge . WHEREAS, the Securities and Exchange Commission Division of Enforcement ("Division") and Defendants Erik K. Bardman and Jennifer F. Wolf ("Defendants" and, together with the SEC, the "Parties") have reached settlement agreements in principle that the Division is currently in the process of submitting to the Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") for approval; WHEREAS, cur
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

WHEREAS, the Securities and Exchange Commission Division of Enforcement ("Division") and Defendants Erik K. Bardman and Jennifer F. Wolf ("Defendants" and, together with the SEC, the "Parties") have reached settlement agreements in principle that the Division is currently in the process of submitting to the Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") for approval;

WHEREAS, currently, the Court has scheduled a Case Management Conference for May 2, 2018 [Docket Entry 84];

WHEREAS, Plaintiff requests approximately six additional weeks to have the matter presented to the Commission, and the Defendants consent to such a request;

IT IS THEREFORE STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the attorneys for Plaintiff and the attorneys for Defendants, with the Court's permission, as follows:

1. The Case Management Conference scheduled for May 2, 2018 is hereby continued until June 14, 2018, or at the soonest available time for the Court thereafter.

2. If the Commission has not approved the terms of the settlement in principle by June 7, 2018, the Parties shall file a Case Management Statement providing an update on the progress of settlement.

ATTESTATION (CIVIL LOCAL RULE 5-1(i)(3))

In accordance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each signatory.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer