Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

JAIN v. WIPRO, INC., 5:09-cv-02743-RS. (2010)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20101215c74 Visitors: 6
Filed: Dec. 14, 2010
Latest Update: Dec. 14, 2010
Summary: ORDER RE STIPULATION TO MODIFY CASE SCHEDULE RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge. Plaintiffs Pravin Jain, Randy Holthaus, Dilip Kukreja, Mark Warner, and Douglas Tanner (collectively "Plaintiffs") and Defendant Wipro, Inc. ("Wipro") agree as follows: The parties have been working diligently to complete discovery before the current January 12, 2011 deadline for non-expert discovery set forth in the modified Case Management Scheduling Order, entered on September 10, 2010 ("Scheduling Order") (Docke
More

ORDER RE STIPULATION TO MODIFY CASE SCHEDULE

RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Pravin Jain, Randy Holthaus, Dilip Kukreja, Mark Warner, and Douglas Tanner (collectively "Plaintiffs") and Defendant Wipro, Inc. ("Wipro") agree as follows:

The parties have been working diligently to complete discovery before the current January 12, 2011 deadline for non-expert discovery set forth in the modified Case Management Scheduling Order, entered on September 10, 2010 ("Scheduling Order") (Docket No. 33). This discovery includes depositions of several key witnesses located in India.

The parties agreed to take the depositions of the India-based witnesses during the week of January 10, 2011, but two of the witnesses, Suresh Vaswani and Suresh Senapaty, subsequently became unavailable for that week.

To accommodate the witnesses' schedules and leave sufficient time for trial preparation, the parties agreed to continue the pre-trial and trial dates if the parties would commit to make its witnesses, including Mr. Vaswani and Mr. Senapaty, available during the week of February 7, 2011.

Consequently, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between Plaintiffs and Wipro, through their respective counsel of record, and pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, that, to the extent allowed by the Court's calendar, the dates set forth in the Scheduling Order be modified as follows:

Close of Non-Expert Discovery February 28, 2011 Plaintiffs' Expert Disclosures March 7, 2011 Defendant's Expert Disclosures March 18, 2011 Further Case Management Conference March 24, 2011 @ 10:00 a.m. Close of Expert Discovery April 4, 2011 Meet and Confer re Pretrial Conference April 7, 2011 Pretrial Motions Heard No Later Than April 18, 2011 Submit Pretrial Statements April 18, 2011 Final Pre-Trial Conference April 28, 2011 @ 10:00 a.m. Jury Trial Begins May 2, 2011

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

Pursuant to stipulation, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that the dates set forth in the modified Case Management Scheduling Order, entered on September 10, 2010 ("Scheduling Order") (Docket No. 33) be modified as follows:

Close of Non-Expert Discovery February 28, 2011 Plaintiffs' Expert Disclosures March 7, 2011 Defendant's Expert Disclosures March 18, 2011 Further Case Management Conference March 24, 2011 @ 10:00 a.m. Close of Expert Discovery April 4, 2011 Meet and Confer re Pretrial Conference April 7, 2011 Dispositive Motions Heard No Later Than April 7, 2011 Submit Pretrial Statements April 18, 2011 Final Pre-Trial Conference April 28, 2011 @ 10:00 a.m. Jury Trial Begins May 9, 2011

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties make their India-based witnesses, Sanjeesh Gupta, Deepak Chandran, Bipin Paracha, Krishnan Subramanian, Neeraj Jaitley, Dilip Kukreja, Rhagavendran Swaminathan, Suresh Vaswani, Indroneel Dutt, and Suresh Senapaty, available for deposition the week of February 7, 2011.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer