Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

(PC) Pasillas, v. State of California,, 1:17-cv-00712-DAD-EPG. (2017)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20171201763 Visitors: 6
Filed: Nov. 30, 2017
Latest Update: Nov. 30, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR DEFENDANT SAVAGE ERICA P. GROSJEAN , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiffs Valdez and Pasillas, and Defendants State of California and California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation through their respective counsel, stipulate as follows: 1. Defendant Savage was served with the Summons and Amended Complaint in this matter on November 13, 2017; 2. The Office of the Attorney General (OAG) will not be represent
More

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR DEFENDANT SAVAGE

Plaintiffs Valdez and Pasillas, and Defendants State of California and California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation through their respective counsel, stipulate as follows:

1. Defendant Savage was served with the Summons and Amended Complaint in this matter on November 13, 2017;

2. The Office of the Attorney General (OAG) will not be representing Savage in this action; and

3. In order to allow Savage an opportunity to retain counsel and defend this action, that the time for Savage to respond to the Amended Complaint is extended two weeks to December 18, 2017.

ORDER

In light of the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing, it is ordered that the time for Defendant Savage to respond to the Amended Complaint is extended to December 18, 2017.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer