PHAN v. EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, 2:16-cv-256 KJM CKD PS. (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20160923b03
Visitors: 7
Filed: Sep. 22, 2016
Latest Update: Sep. 22, 2016
Summary: ORDER CAROLYN K. DELANEY , Magistrate Judge . This matter was initially referred to the magistrate judge for pretrial management because plaintiff was proceeding pro se. See Local Rule 302(c)(21). On September 19, 2016, counsel substituted in for plaintiff. Because plaintiff is now represented by counsel, pretrial matters, other than discovery motions, should now be noticed before the District Judge assigned to this action. The magistrate judge shall continue to perform all duties describ
Summary: ORDER CAROLYN K. DELANEY , Magistrate Judge . This matter was initially referred to the magistrate judge for pretrial management because plaintiff was proceeding pro se. See Local Rule 302(c)(21). On September 19, 2016, counsel substituted in for plaintiff. Because plaintiff is now represented by counsel, pretrial matters, other than discovery motions, should now be noticed before the District Judge assigned to this action. The magistrate judge shall continue to perform all duties describe..
More
ORDER
CAROLYN K. DELANEY, Magistrate Judge.
This matter was initially referred to the magistrate judge for pretrial management because plaintiff was proceeding pro se. See Local Rule 302(c)(21). On September 19, 2016, counsel substituted in for plaintiff. Because plaintiff is now represented by counsel, pretrial matters, other than discovery motions, should now be noticed before the District Judge assigned to this action. The magistrate judge shall continue to perform all duties described in Local Rule 302(c)(1)-(20).
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. This matter is referred back to the District Judge assigned to this action;
2. All dates pending before the undersigned are vacated; and
3. Henceforth the caption on documents filed in this action shall be No. 2:16-cv-256 KJM CKD.
Source: Leagle
