Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Chapman v. Phyllis' Giant Burger, 3:18-cv-03681-EMC. (2018)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20180725895 Visitors: 6
Filed: Jul. 24, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 24, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION FOR FIRST EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANTS PHYLLIS' GIANT BURGER, JMCHO, INC. DBA PHYLLIS' GIANT BURGER AND KAR-FOURTH LLC TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff, Byron Chapman ("Plaintiff"), by and through his counsel of record, and Defendant Phyllis' Giant Burger, Defendant JMCHO, INC. a California corporation d.b.a. Phyllis' Giant Burger and Defendant Kar-Fourth, LLC, a California limited liability (collectiv
More

STIPULATION FOR FIRST EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANTS PHYLLIS' GIANT BURGER, JMCHO, INC. DBA PHYLLIS' GIANT BURGER AND KAR-FOURTH LLC TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff, Byron Chapman ("Plaintiff"), by and through his counsel of record, and Defendant Phyllis' Giant Burger, Defendant JMCHO, INC. a California corporation d.b.a. Phyllis' Giant Burger and Defendant Kar-Fourth, LLC, a California limited liability (collectively "Defendants"), by and through their counsel of record, that pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(a) and Local Rule 6-1(a), that Defendants may have to and including August 30, 2018 to file a responsive pleading to this matter. This is Defendants first extension of time and does not alter the date of any event or deadline fixed by Court order, including the last date by which the joint site inspection must be conducted pursuant to General Order 56.

I attest that the signature of the person whose electronic signature is shown above is maintained by me, and that her concurrence in the filing of this document and attribution of her signature was obtained.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer