PORTER v. LUCASFILM LTD. LLC, 15-cv-03961-JSC. (2016)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20160825963
Visitors: 10
Filed: Aug. 24, 2016
Latest Update: Aug. 24, 2016
Summary: ORDER OF DISMISSAL Re: Dkt. No. 69 JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY , Magistrate Judge . The Court having been advised that the parties have agreed to a settlement of this case, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice; provided, however, that if any party hereto shall certify to this Court, within sixty (60) days, with proof of service of a copy thereon to opposing counsel, that the agreed consideration for said settlement has not been delivered over, the fo
Summary: ORDER OF DISMISSAL Re: Dkt. No. 69 JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY , Magistrate Judge . The Court having been advised that the parties have agreed to a settlement of this case, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice; provided, however, that if any party hereto shall certify to this Court, within sixty (60) days, with proof of service of a copy thereon to opposing counsel, that the agreed consideration for said settlement has not been delivered over, the for..
More
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Re: Dkt. No. 69
JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY, Magistrate Judge.
The Court having been advised that the parties have agreed to a settlement of this case,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice; provided, however, that if any party hereto shall certify to this Court, within sixty (60) days, with proof of service of a copy thereon to opposing counsel, that the agreed consideration for said settlement has not been delivered over, the foregoing Order shall stand vacated and this case shall forthwith be restored to the calendar to be set for trial.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
