Filed: Oct. 31, 2017
Latest Update: Oct. 31, 2017
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER RE CHOICE OF LAW AND RELATED ISSUES HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, Jr. , District Judge . On October 17, 2017, the Court entered an order entitled, ORDER DIRECTING SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS. See Dkt. No. 59. Following that Order, the parties met and conferred relating to choice-of-law and related issues. The parties reached an agreement that California substantive law applies to this action. Plaintiff requested an opportunity to file a suppl
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER RE CHOICE OF LAW AND RELATED ISSUES HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, Jr. , District Judge . On October 17, 2017, the Court entered an order entitled, ORDER DIRECTING SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS. See Dkt. No. 59. Following that Order, the parties met and conferred relating to choice-of-law and related issues. The parties reached an agreement that California substantive law applies to this action. Plaintiff requested an opportunity to file a supple..
More
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER RE CHOICE OF LAW AND RELATED ISSUES
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, Jr., District Judge.
On October 17, 2017, the Court entered an order entitled, ORDER DIRECTING SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS. See Dkt. No. 59. Following that Order, the parties met and conferred relating to choice-of-law and related issues.
The parties reached an agreement that California substantive law applies to this action.
Plaintiff requested an opportunity to file a supplementt to its opposition brief to address the third claim for relief (for fraud) under California law. Defendant agreed to that requeest.
Defendant requested an opportunity to file a reply in response to the proposed supplemental opposition. Plaintiff agreed to that request.
THEREFORE, the parties, through their undersigned counsel, STIPULATE annd request that the Court enter an ORDER, as follows:
1. California substantive law shall apply in this action.
2. Plaintiff shall file, on or before November 2, 20017, a supplement to its opposition brrief, not to exceed three pages, relating to its third claim for relief (for fraud).
3. Defendant shall file, on or before November 9, 2017, a brief in reply to Plaintiff's supplemental opposition brief, not to exceed three pages.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
ORDER
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
