Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Dancil v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc., 2:18-cv-00557-WBS-KJN. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20180509b79 Visitors: 15
Filed: May 07, 2018
Latest Update: May 07, 2018
Summary: JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER WILLIAM B. SHUBB , District Judge . Pursuant to United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Civil Local Rule 144(a), which requires Court approval for any extension to respond to the initial complaint beyond 28 days, plaintiff Roberto Dancil Richardson ("Plaintiff") and defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. ("Wells Fargo"), hereby jointly move for an extension for Wells Fargo to file its responsi
More

JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Civil Local Rule 144(a), which requires Court approval for any extension to respond to the initial complaint beyond 28 days, plaintiff Roberto Dancil Richardson ("Plaintiff") and defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. ("Wells Fargo"), hereby jointly move for an extension for Wells Fargo to file its responsive pleading based on the following facts:

1. Plaintiff served the complaint on March 14, 2018;

2. Wells Fargo's deadline to respond to the complaint was April 6, 2018;

3. Plaintiff and Wells Fargo entered into a stipulation to postpone the response deadline to May 4, 2018;

4. Plaintiff and Wells Fargo are engaged in settlement discussions and believe that they can resolve their dispute if an additional 28-day extension is granted by the Court;

5. Plaintiff and Wells Fargo therefore move jointly to extend for the second time Wells Fargo's deadline to respond to the Complaint to June 1, 2018.

ORDER

Pursuant to the joint motion of plaintiff Roberto Dancil and defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., and good cause appearing, the deadline for Wells Fargo to respond to Plaintiff's complaint is hereby extended to June 1, 2018. No other deadlines shall be affected by this Order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer