Fulford v. Griffith, 16-cv-00770-MEJ (NJV). (2017)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20171005f15
Visitors: 9
Filed: Oct. 04, 2017
Latest Update: Oct. 04, 2017
Summary: REPORT OF PRO SE PRISONER EARLY SETTLEMENT PROCEEDING NANDOR J. VADAS , Magistrate Judge . A settlement conference was held on October 4, 2017, and the results of that proceeding are indicated below: (1) The following individuals, parties, and/or representatives participated in the proceeding, and each possessed the requisite settlement authority: (X) Plaintiff, Fred Fulford Pro Se. ( ) Warden or warden's representative ( ) Office of the California Attorney General (X) Other: Kevin Kel
Summary: REPORT OF PRO SE PRISONER EARLY SETTLEMENT PROCEEDING NANDOR J. VADAS , Magistrate Judge . A settlement conference was held on October 4, 2017, and the results of that proceeding are indicated below: (1) The following individuals, parties, and/or representatives participated in the proceeding, and each possessed the requisite settlement authority: (X) Plaintiff, Fred Fulford Pro Se. ( ) Warden or warden's representative ( ) Office of the California Attorney General (X) Other: Kevin Kell..
More
REPORT OF PRO SE PRISONER EARLY SETTLEMENT PROCEEDING
NANDOR J. VADAS, Magistrate Judge.
A settlement conference was held on October 4, 2017, and the results of that proceeding are indicated below:
(1) The following individuals, parties, and/or representatives participated in the proceeding, and each possessed the requisite settlement authority:
(X) Plaintiff, Fred Fulford Pro Se.
( ) Warden or warden's representative
( ) Office of the California Attorney General
(X) Other: Kevin Kelly.
(2) The following individuals, parties, and/or representatives did not appear: _____________________________________________________________________
(3) The outcome of the proceeding was:
( ) The case has been completely settled. The parties agree that a proposed stipulated order for dismissal of this case will be filed with the Court on ________________.
( ) The case has been partially resolved and counsel for defendants shall file a joint stipulation regarding those claims which have been resolved. The issues outlined on the sheet attached remain for this Court to resolve.
(X) The parties are unable to reach an agreement at this time and continue to negotiate. Parties are awaiting a ruling on the pending motion for summary judgment and are exchanging further documents. If necessary, the matter may be placed on calendar in approximately forty-five days for a scheduling/setting conference.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
