ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE OPPOSITION OR STATEMENT OF NON-OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF No. 35) THIRTY (30) DAY DEADLINE

BARBARA A. McAULIFFE, Magistrate Judge.

Plaintiff Jesse Washington is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case currently proceeds on Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claim of deliberate indifference to his medical needs against Defendants Rouch and Sisodia.

On January 5, 2018, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. (ECF No. 35.) Plaintiff was provided with notice of the requirements for opposing a motion for summary judgment. Woods v. Carey, 684 F.3d 934 (9th Cir. 2012); Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952, 957 (9th Cir. 1988); Klingele v. Eikenberry, 849 F.2d 409, 411-12 (9th Cir. 1988). (ECF No. 35-1.)

Plaintiff's response was due within twenty-one (21) days of the date of service of Defendants' motion. That deadline has passed, but Plaintiff has not filed an opposition or statement of non-opposition to the motion. Plaintiff also has not otherwise communicated with the Court.

Pursuant to Local Rule 230(l), Plaintiff is HEREBY ORDERED to file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to Defendants' motion for summary judgment within thirty (30) days. Plaintiff is warned that the failure to comply with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions, including a recommendation to dismiss this action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.