ORTEGA v. VILLAGOMEZ, 14-cv-03783-HSG. (2016)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20161228944
Visitors: 18
Filed: Dec. 27, 2016
Latest Update: Dec. 27, 2016
Summary: CONDITIONAL ORDER OF DISMISSAL Re: Dkt. No. 79 HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, Jr. , District Judge . The Court having been advised that the parties have agreed to a settlement of this case, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case be dismissed with prejudice; provided, however, that if any party hereto shall certify to this Court, with proof of service of a copy thereon on opposing counsel, within 60 days from the date hereof, that the agreed consideration for said settlement has not been delivered over,
Summary: CONDITIONAL ORDER OF DISMISSAL Re: Dkt. No. 79 HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, Jr. , District Judge . The Court having been advised that the parties have agreed to a settlement of this case, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case be dismissed with prejudice; provided, however, that if any party hereto shall certify to this Court, with proof of service of a copy thereon on opposing counsel, within 60 days from the date hereof, that the agreed consideration for said settlement has not been delivered over, ..
More
CONDITIONAL ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Re: Dkt. No. 79
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, Jr., District Judge.
The Court having been advised that the parties have agreed to a settlement of this case,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case be dismissed with prejudice; provided, however, that if any party hereto shall certify to this Court, with proof of service of a copy thereon on opposing counsel, within 60 days from the date hereof, that the agreed consideration for said settlement has not been delivered over, the foregoing Order shall stand vacated and this case shall forthwith be restored to the calendar to be set for trial.
Source: Leagle
