CAKEBREAD v. BERKELEY MILLWORK AND FURNITURE CO., INC., 16-cv-00083-RS. (2016)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20160921800
Visitors: 24
Filed: Sep. 20, 2016
Latest Update: Sep. 20, 2016
Summary: ORDER CONTINUING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT HEARING RICHARD SEEBORG , District Judge . In light of the discovery dispute pending before Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu, the hearing on Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment is continued without prejudice. The Court refrains from addressing Defendant's request for deferral under Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 56(d) at this time. Once Magistrate Judge Ryu has resolved the parties' dispute, Plaintiffs may place their motion back on calendar and the parties
Summary: ORDER CONTINUING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT HEARING RICHARD SEEBORG , District Judge . In light of the discovery dispute pending before Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu, the hearing on Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment is continued without prejudice. The Court refrains from addressing Defendant's request for deferral under Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 56(d) at this time. Once Magistrate Judge Ryu has resolved the parties' dispute, Plaintiffs may place their motion back on calendar and the parties ..
More
ORDER CONTINUING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT HEARING
RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge.
In light of the discovery dispute pending before Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu, the hearing on Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment is continued without prejudice. The Court refrains from addressing Defendant's request for deferral under Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 56(d) at this time. Once Magistrate Judge Ryu has resolved the parties' dispute, Plaintiffs may place their motion back on calendar and the parties may file supplemental briefs based on new discovery, if any.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
