ANTQUAN DURPREE CLAY v. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, ED CV 15-2395-GHK (DFM). (2016)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20160929841
Visitors: 14
Filed: Sep. 28, 2016
Latest Update: Sep. 28, 2016
Summary: Order Accepting Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge GEORGE H. KING , District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1), the Court has reviewed the Complaint, the parties' motion and opposition papers, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the assigned United States Magistrate Judge. None of the parties have filed objections to the Report and Recommendation. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation is approved and accepted. 2
Summary: Order Accepting Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge GEORGE H. KING , District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1), the Court has reviewed the Complaint, the parties' motion and opposition papers, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the assigned United States Magistrate Judge. None of the parties have filed objections to the Report and Recommendation. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation is approved and accepted. 2...
More
Order Accepting Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge
GEORGE H. KING, District Judge.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the Court has reviewed the Complaint, the parties' motion and opposition papers, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the assigned United States Magistrate Judge. None of the parties have filed objections to the Report and Recommendation.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The Report and Recommendation is approved and accepted.
2. Defendants' motion to dismiss is denied.
3. Defendants Harris and Foxwell are ordered to answer the FAC within fourteen (14) days from the date of this Order.
Source: Leagle
