Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Hendricks v. Starkist Co., 3:13-cv-0729-HSG. (2015)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20150424c56 Visitors: 6
Filed: Apr. 23, 2015
Latest Update: Apr. 23, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER STAYING DEADLINES HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, Jr. , District Judge . Plaintiff and Defendant StarKist Co., by and through their respective counsel of record, enter into the following stipulation, based upon the recitals below: 1. On May 14, 2014, the Court entered a Case Management Order (Dkt. No. 66) setting certain case deadlines. 2. On March 26, 2015, the Court entered a Stipulation and Order Regarding Conducting Certain Depositions After the Non-Expert Discovery Cut-Off
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER STAYING DEADLINES

Plaintiff and Defendant StarKist Co., by and through their respective counsel of record, enter into the following stipulation, based upon the recitals below:

1. On May 14, 2014, the Court entered a Case Management Order (Dkt. No. 66) setting certain case deadlines. 2. On March 26, 2015, the Court entered a Stipulation and Order Regarding Conducting Certain Depositions After the Non-Expert Discovery Cut-Off (Dkt. No. 140) permitting the depositions of (1) the Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and (2) Bursor & Fisher, P.A. to occur after the April 1, 2015 non-expert discovery cut-off. 3. On March 30, 2015, the parties filed a Joint Stipulation Regarding Briefing Schedule on Motion to Quash (Dkt. No. 144) agreeing that Plaintiff's portion of the joint letter concerning the Bursor & Fisher, P.A. deposition shall be exchanged by April 23, 2015, StarKist's portion of the joint letter shall be exchanged by April 28, 2015, the joint letter shall be filed by April 29, 2015, and if Plaintiff's requested relief is denied, the deposition of Bursor & Fisher, P.A. shall proceed on May 12, 2015. 4. On April 16, 2015, the parties agreed to a class action settlement term sheet. 5. The parties are currently drafting a settlement agreement which will be submitted to the Court on May 8, 2015 in connection with a motion for preliminary approval of the settlement.

Counsel for the parties have conferred and have agreed, subject to Court approval, that the following case deadlines set in the Court's May 14, 2014 Order should be stayed pending adjudication of the Motion for Preliminary Approval:

Opening Disclosure of Experts: May 1, 2015 Rebuttal Disclosure of Experts: June 1, 2015 Expert Discovery Cutoff: July 7, 2015

In addition, the parties have agreed, subject to Court approval, that the motion to quash briefing referenced in the March 30, 2015 stipulation should be stayed, and the depositions of the Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and Bursor & Fisher, P.A., referenced in the Court's March 26, 2015 Order Regarding Conducting Certain Depositions After the Non-Expert Discovery Cut-Off, may be continued to a later date.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, and good cause appearing, the Court hereby orders that the following case deadlines are stayed pending adjudication of the Motion for Preliminary Approval:

Opening Disclosure of Experts: May 1, 2015 Rebuttal Disclosure of Experts: June 1, 2015 Expert Discovery Cutoff: July 7, 2015

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion to quash briefing referenced in the March 30, 2015 stipulation is stayed, and the depositions of the Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and Bursor & Fisher, P.A. may be continued to a later date.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer