Filed: Feb. 24, 2016
Latest Update: Feb. 24, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION ORDERING PLAINTIFF TONY MEHRDAD SAGHEBIAN'S CLAIMS INTO ARBITRATION AND DISMISSING HIS INDIVIDUAL CLAIMS WITHOUT PREJUDICE EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . STIPULATION Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1), Plaintiff Tony Mehrdad Saghebian ("Plaintiff") and Defendants Uber Technologies, Inc. and Rasier-CA LLC (together, "Defendants") (collectively, the "Parties"), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows: WHEREAS, on Septe
Summary: STIPULATION ORDERING PLAINTIFF TONY MEHRDAD SAGHEBIAN'S CLAIMS INTO ARBITRATION AND DISMISSING HIS INDIVIDUAL CLAIMS WITHOUT PREJUDICE EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . STIPULATION Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1), Plaintiff Tony Mehrdad Saghebian ("Plaintiff") and Defendants Uber Technologies, Inc. and Rasier-CA LLC (together, "Defendants") (collectively, the "Parties"), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows: WHEREAS, on Septem..
More
STIPULATION ORDERING PLAINTIFF TONY MEHRDAD SAGHEBIAN'S CLAIMS INTO ARBITRATION AND DISMISSING HIS INDIVIDUAL CLAIMS WITHOUT PREJUDICE
EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge.
STIPULATION
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1), Plaintiff Tony Mehrdad Saghebian ("Plaintiff") and Defendants Uber Technologies, Inc. and Rasier-CA LLC (together, "Defendants") (collectively, the "Parties"), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows:
WHEREAS, on September 21, 2015, Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint in the above-captioned matter adding Tony Mehrdad Saghebian as a Plaintiff in the Del Rio v. Uber Technologies, Inc., et al matter;
WHEREAS, on January 22, 2016, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss based, in part, on this Court's prior ruling in O'Connor v Uber Technologies, Inc. et al., Case No. 13-cv-03826-EMC that individuals, like Saghebian, who (1) did not "sign[ ] up to drive directly with Uber or an Uber subsidiary under their individual name," or (2) are not/were not "paid by Uber or an Uber subsidiary directly and in their individual name" present individualized issues that are not suitable class treatment; O'Connor et al. v. Uber Technologies, Inc., 2015 WL 8292006 at *3 (N.D. Cal. Dec. 9, 2015);
WHEREAS, in light of that prior ruling, and so as to avoid the Court having to determine the same issue at a later point in this litigation, Plaintiff Tony Mehrdad Saghebian agrees to pursue his claims in arbitration on an individual basis and not on a putative class or collective basis;
WHEREAS, the parties agree that, notwithstanding any provision in any arbitration provision to which Saghebian agreed, Uber will pay for the arbitrator's fees and the arbitration-specific fees pertaining to the resolution of the Plaintiff's claims against Defendants, provided those claims are asserted on an individual basis, and not as a class or collective action; and
NOW THEREFORE, the Parties hereby stipulate and agree, through their undersigned counsel, that (1) Plaintiff's claims against Defendants shall be dismissed from the instant lawsuit; (2) Plaintiff's claims against Defendants shall be resolved in arbitration on an individual basis only, and not on a class or collective action basis; (3) Uber shall pay for the arbitrator's costs and arbitration-specific fees pertaining to the aforementioned arbitration; (4) each party shall bear his or its respective attorneys' fees incurred in relation to the instant action and the aforementioned arbitration, except as otherwise provided in any award of attorneys' fees made by a judge or arbitrator in this action or the aforementioned arbitration; and (5) this stipulation and dismissal shall not influence the rights or obligations of Plaintiff Ricardo Del Rio.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
* Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), the filer hereby attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from all signatories.
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.